X's ad revenue plunged by $1.5B due to recent boycotts.

A deep comparison of different variables contributing to the sales performance of X and Twitter. This essay also touches on the evolving nature of digital ad platforms and their effects on customer engagement and revenue generation.


In digital advertising, a platform's success is often measured by its ad sales. Comparisons are frequently drawn between the performance of different platforms, with companies often looking to emulate the success of established players. Recently, the industry has directed its attention to X's ad sales performance compared to Twitter's past success.

Scarlett Johansson sues AI app for using her voice without permission in online ad.
Related Article

While some people see parallels between the two, a high-ranking executive at X has urged individuals to stop comparing X's ad performance to Twitter's past success. He emphasizes that they are disparate models and should not be considered synonymous.


Assessing X's Ad Sales

X's ad revenues have painted a dismal picture in recent times. Despite a significant shift in the industry towards digital marketing, the company has experienced stagnant growth in its ad sales. This dismal ad performance has become the topic of industry concern, sparking comparisons with Twitter's gilded past success.

Twitter has amassed a significant amount of its revenue from ads. The company had a well-structured marketing strategy which allowed it to rake in handsome profits from its digital advertising. Naturally, many stakeholders in the industry have compared the two platforms, taking Twitter's past success as a benchmark for what X should be achieving.

Twitter's Success With Ad Sales

Comparisons between X's ad sales and Twitter's past success are constant, but X's executives urge stakeholders to consider context before drawing conclusions. Twitter's success can indeed serve as an instructive model, but the executive stresses that there are key differences between the two platforms that simply cannot be ignored.

Scientists made a vital achievement in decoding whale language.
Related Article

Understanding Twitter's journey can provide some insights into the nature of ad sales. Twitter began as a radical idea, morphed into a trendsetter, and then transformed into a viable business. It developed a successful ad model, which has been a sturdy revenue generator. Thus, the comparisons that people make based on ad sales figures do have some legitimacy.

Disparity Between Two Models

While comparisons are being drawn, it's important to remember that X and Twitter have different models. Twitter primarily evolved as a social networking site, while X's foundation lies in providing digital services. The business models, user demographics, and utility of these two platforms are fundamentally different, which impacts ad sales.

The two platforms also attract different types of users. Twitter, with its emphasis on public conversation, draws a distinct demographic, with preferences and behaviors that are different from those who use X's platform. And this difference matters when it comes to ads. The success of an ad, after all, is in its ability to speak to its audience, which varies within these two platforms.

Evolution of the Ad Ecosystem

Another important point to consider is the evolving nature of the digital ad ecosystem. Since Twitter's early days, the ad landscape has grown and evolved incessantly. Changes in user behavior, market dynamics, and technology advancements have transformed the ad sales ecosystem.

These changes are particularly important for X. Given the state of modern ad ecosystems, X's ad sales can't be reliably compared to Twitter's past success. In summary, while Twitter's past success can be looked at for inspiration and guidance, it doesn't serve as the perfect counterpart to measure X's current performance.

Nurturing Success

Instead of comparisons, what X needs is to focus on its strengths and carve its path to success. X needs to deeply analyze its target markets, its unique selling proposition, and how it can leverage these to build a robust ad sales machine, rather than comparing its growth to the retroactive success of Twitter.

Twitter's past success and X's current performance are based on their context. X should see Twitter's past success not as a benchmark, but as a learning point, and also factor in the changing dynamics of the digital ad ecosystem in its quest to increase ad sales.


While comparisons can be instructive, they can also be misleading if the context they operate in is different. In X's case, emulating Twitter's past success wouldn't necessarily ensure success. Allowing such comparisons to define X's performance in the digital ad space could inhibit it from carving its unique path.

Twitter's past success and X's present might be different tales, but one thing they share in common is the relentless quest to increase ad sales. As the landscape of digital advertising is continuously evolving, the success story of an ad platform now and then remains a point of fascination in the industry.