Users are upset with Glassdoor for revealing their real names without permission, leading many to stop using the site.

Glassdoor, renowned for its employee reviews and company ratings, is recently in the news for matters relating to user privacy and consent. The company is now updating its users profiles without their consent, a move that has raised many questions about privacy policies and user rights.

The company’s new process involves adding users' real names and job information to their profiles. This shift from anonymous profiles to transparent identities stands in stark contrast to their previous policy that protected users' identity while they shared their experiences.

The change seems aimed at making user profiles more accurate and transparent, but the move has been criticized severely. Critics argue that the blurring of personal and professional information could potentially lead to negative consequences for the users.

For instance, employees reviewing their employers might self-censor knowing their bosses could see their reviews. The transparency could also potentially influence the hiring processes and create biases.

Glassdoor’s decision to make such a major shift is surprising, given the increasing emphasis on privacy in the digital age. Moreover, it raises concerns about the company's intentions since it plans to commercialize this new identity information.

To make matters more concerning, users were not provided any prior notification about these changes. It was only upon discovery did users become aware of the changes made to their profiles.

This has led to vocal criticism on various public platforms, with people expressing worries about the potential misuse of sensitive information. It has also caused many users to question the company's commitment to user privacy.

Privacy advocates argue that divulging someone's real name and job information without their consent is a breach of privacy, affecting users' trust. Several privacy advocacy groups have called upon Glassdoor to reverse their decision.

Some users have stated that they joined the platform with the implicit understanding of confidentiality. Users feel cheated as their expectation of being able to share their experiences anonymously has been thwarted.

Users fear that if the information falls into the wrong hands, it could be used against them. For example, highly critical reviews could be traced back to an employee, resulting in professional consequences.

Despite the widespread criticisms, Glassdoor defended their actions stating the change was crucial for the company's future. They mentioned that this move would help them provide better services by enabling them to gather more personal data of users.

Glassdoor further stated that they understand and respect the concerns raised. They ensured they have taken steps to protect user identity and they will not sell or share this data with third parties.

However, not everyone is convinced with Glassdoor’s explanation and assurances. Critics remain skeptical, saying that the company must improve its transparency and be explicit about how they use the new data, how long it's stored, and who has access to it.

Experts argue that companies like Glassdoor should always consider and respect user consent before making significant changes, especially when it involves sensitive information. Acting without the user’s knowledge can undermine trust in the company.

This incident serves as a reminder that tech companies must tread carefully when dealing with user data. Privacy should not be compromised, especially in a time where data is becoming increasingly valuable.

These are crucial times for Glassdoor as it faces significant backlash. The company needs to assuage users' fears and prove that it prioritizes user privacy. Prioritizing such transparency could serve as a route back to gaining user trust.

To regain the lost trust, Glassdoor should engage with its users and address their concerns promptly and comprehensively. They should also make efforts to gain user consent before making changes in the future. It is essential that users feel safe and valued on the platform.

In conclusion, while Glassdoor’s move can be seen as a step towards more accurate and transparent user profiles, it has seen serious backlash due to privacy concerns. The entire saga is a reminder for all digital platforms to not overlook the importance of data privacy and user consent.