Fortnite players exhibit a range of views on whether the game should enhance rewards for obtaining a Victory Royale. The prospect of providing players additional motivation to secure victory has both pros and cons.
As it stands, apart from gaining extra experience, personal satisfaction, and a Victory Crown, there isn't much else to gain from triumphing in Fortnite. If it is a player's initial victory of the season, the game also bestows a season-themed glider. Other victories are generally celebrated purely for the bragging rights.
The battle to claim a Victory Royale is no insignificant task, particularly in higher-tier lobbies. This struggle has encouraged some individuals to contemplate increasing the number of awards provided.
The debate was ignited with a Reddit post detailing a potential system of awards following a victory. Among these were an XP (experience points) boost, additional V-Bucks (in-game currency), or more stars to speed up the progression of the battle pass.
However, players' views on the introduction of such rewards in Fortnite are split. Some gamers support changing the rewards system, yet others prefer to keep it as it is.
The concern leading the discussion against this change mostly revolves around the intensity of the game. It stands to reason that introducing more awards for Victory Royales could potentially elevate the level of competition, particularly among more hardcore players, also known as 'sweats.'
Some players shared their experiences, recalling the surprise they felt when they didn't receive V-Bucks as a reward after their first victory. Having such expectations clarified could prevent future misunderstandings.
Although the voices advocating for a reward change were fewer, their argument sparked discussions on the extent to which Fortnite might incentivize players to win games.
The primary argument in favor of altering the reward system revolved around V-Bucks. Players suggested that these could be won in matches and used to purchase items in the game. However, this idea was met with opposition from others who argued that Epic Games, the developer behind Fortnite, would never give away V-Bucks for free.
The reason behind this thinking is mainly economic. The primary way for Fortnite to generate revenue is through the sale of these V-Bucks for real money. Offering V-Bucks as a reward for victories could potentially harm the game's profitability.
If players could earn V-Bucks simply by winning matches, it might lead to a drop in purchases, directly affecting the game's revenue. This is a significant point of consideration for the developers, and one of the reasons players believe it unlikely that they would implement such a system.
Yet, the underlying root of the debate isn't about profitability but about the gaming experience. On one hand, additional rewards could motivate players to play more and perform better. On the other, it could ramp up the level of competition, putting more pressure on casual players and potentially making the game less enjoyable for them.
The discussion at the heart of the debate is a familiar one in the gaming world: how should a game balance competitiveness and enjoyment? Too little competitiveness may make a game uninteresting, while too much could result in frustration and stress for players, particularly those who play casually for relaxation.
At the end of the day, each player's preference is influenced by their perspective on what constitutes a rewarding gaming experience. Yet, the ultimate decision lies with Epic Games, and the direction they choose will inevitably influence the future of Fortnite.
While the conversation surrounding potential extra rewards for Fortnite victories continues, it's evident that the players' opinions lean more towards maintaining the status quo rather than implementing drastic changes.
For now, the existing system seems to satisfy the majority of the players and has the advantage of familiarity, ruling the battlefield of Fortnite with no signs of imminent change.